Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Usefulness of smear microscopy for therapeutic decision-making in patients with infectious keratitis

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the usefulness of smears in the diagnosis of infectious keratitis by comparing smears and 2 different culture methods.

Study design

Retrospective, observational study.

Methods

The foci of 73 patients diagnosed with infectious keratitis at Hiroshima University Hospital between July 2011 and September 2015 were abraded, and smear microscopy and culturing were performed. The microorganism detection rates and other parameters were compared.

Results

Microorganisms were detected in 47 of 73 specimens. Microorganisms were identified in 32 of 69 cases cultured on plain medium (detection rate, 46.4%) compared with 22 of 61 cases cultured on swab transport medium (detection rate, 36.1%). There was no significant difference in the microbial detection rate between the plain medium method and the swab transport medium method (P = 0.23). Smear microscopy and culture findings were concordant in 21 (28.8%) cases, and different microorganisms were detected in 9 cases. In 17 cases, the culture was negative, despite the presence of microorganisms on smear microscopy, and in 7 cases, the culture was positive, despite the absence of microorganisms on smear microscopy. The positivity rate of microbial detection was significantly higher when no antimicrobial agents had been administered previously (odds ratio 7.50, P = 0.017).

Conclusion

Smear microscopy of abrasions from lesions is useful for the initiation of treatment for infectious keratitis. However, culture studies should be conducted at the same time to confirm antimicrobial sensitivity. If possible, smear microscopy should be performed before the initiation of antimicrobial therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hatano H, Inoue K, Ohashi Y, Shimomura Y, Sakamoto M, Okamoto Y. Drug sensitivity of causative agents in ocular infection of external adnexa and anterior segments—multicenter study of causative agents and drug sensitivity of ocular infection by the Japanese association for ocular infection part II. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2011;115:814–24 (in Japanese).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Moshirfar M, Hopping GC, Vaidyanathan U, Liu H, Somani AN, Ronquillo YC, et al. Biological staining and culturing in infectious keratitis: controversy in clinical utility. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2019;8:145–51.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. McLeod SD, Kolahdouz-Isfahani A, Rostamian K, Flowers CW, Lee PP, McDonnell PJ. The role of smears, cultures, and antibiotic sensitivity testing in the management of suspected infectious keratitis. Ophthalmology. 1996;103:23–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kudo J, Hatano H, Kurita M, Ohno S. Comparison of smear and culture techniques. Nihon Ganka Kiyo. 1995;46:1231–3 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nakabayashi J, Mikawa Y, Okinami S. Infectious corneal ulcer cases in the past 10 years at Saga medical school hospital. Nihon Ganka Kiyo. 2002;53:368–72 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hernandez-Camarena JC, Graue-Hernandez EO, Ortiz-Casas M, Ramirez-Miranda A, Navas A, Pedro-Aguilar L, et al. Trends in microbiological and antibiotic sensitivity patterns in infectious keratitis: 10-year experience in Mexico city. Cornea. 2015;34:778–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang-Sotomayor M, Llorens Belles V, Latasiewicz M, Torras-Sanvicens J, Blanco-Dominguez I, Sabater-Cruz N, et al. Comparison of two methods for obtaining and transporting corneal samples in suspected infectious keratitis. J Fr Ophthalmol. 2020;43:477–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pakzad-Vaezi K, Levasseur SD, Schendel S, Mark S, Mathias R, Roscoe D, et al. The corneal ulcer one-touch study: a simplified microbiological specimen collection method. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159:37–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Aruljyothi L, Radhakrishnan N, Prajna VN, Lalitha P. Clinical and microbiological study of paediatric infectious keratitis in South India: a 3-year study(2011–2013). Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100:1719–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sharma S, Taneja M, Gupta R, Upponi A, Gopinathan U, Nutheti R, et al. Comparison of clinical and microbiological profiles in smear-positive and smear-negative cases of suspected microbial keratitis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007;55:21–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shimizu D, Miyazaki D, Ehara F, Shimizu Y, Uotani R, Inata K. Effectiveness of 16S ribosomal DNA real-time PCR and sequencing for diagnosing bacterial keratitis. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020;258:157–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Khor WB, Prajna VN, Garg P, Mehta JS, Xie L, Liu Z, et al. The asia cornea society infectious keratitis study: a prospective multicenter study of infectious keratitis in asia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;195:161–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Study Group of National Surveillance of Infectious Keratitis in Japan. National surveillance of infectious keratitis in Japan. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2006;110:961–72. (in Japanese)

  14. Sharma S, Kunimoto DY, Gopinathan U, Athmanathan S, Garg P, Rao GN. Evaluation of corneal scraping smear examination methods in the diagnosis of bacterial and fungal keratitis: a survey of eight years of laboratory experience. Cornea. 2002;21:643–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kiehlbauch JA, Hannett GE, Salfinger M, Archinal W, Monserrat C, Carlyn C. Use of the national committee for clinical laboratory standards guidelines for disc diffusion susceptibility testing in New York state laboratories. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:3341–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Austin A, Lietman T, Rose-Nussbaumer J. Update on the management of infectious keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:1678–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakano S, Tomaru Y, Kubota T, Takase H, Mochizuki M, Shimizu N, et al. Evaluation of a multiplex strip PCR test for infectious uveitis:a prospective multicenter study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;213:252–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakano S, Sugita S, Tomaru Y, Hono A, Nakamuro T, Kubota T, et al. Establishment of multiplex solid-phase strip PCR test for detection of 24 ocular infectious disease pathogens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:1553–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Somerville TF, Corless CE, Sueke H, Neal T, Kaye SB. 16s ribosomal RNA versus conventional diagnostic culture in the investigation of suspected bacterial keratitis. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9:2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan

    Kaori Mitoma, Tai-ichiro Chikama, Ryotaro Toda, Yuki Yuasa & Yoshiaki Kiuchi

Authors
  1. Kaori Mitoma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tai-ichiro Chikama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ryotaro Toda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yuki Yuasa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yoshiaki Kiuchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaori Mitoma.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

K. Mitoma, None; T. Chikama, None; R. Toda, None; Y. Yuasa, None; Y. Kiuchi, None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Corresponding Author: Kaori Mitoma

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mitoma, K., Chikama, Ti., Toda, R. et al. Usefulness of smear microscopy for therapeutic decision-making in patients with infectious keratitis. Jpn J Ophthalmol 67, 570–577 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-023-01011-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-023-01011-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation